When the New York Times recently posted an opinion piece about the right amount of therapy for optimal change, I felt excited and gratified all at once. You see, as a brief therapist, I understand all too well that like most things, therapy is subject to the law of diminishing returns. This economics term essentially means that after a certain amount of input and effort, the benefits reaped from that effort—therapeutic change, for example—peak and plateau. More effort doesn’t yield more benefits; in fact, increased efforts could even do more harm than good.
It used to be that therapy was a lifelong process intended to get at the root of people’s unconscious drives and motivations—but quite frankly, nobody has time for that anymore! As the article mentions, most people these days seek therapy to overcome particular challenges and stuck situations in their lives. The truth is, it doesn’t take endless amounts of therapy to gain the perspective and tools necessary for overcoming those kinds of issues.
Every individual’s experience in therapy is different, but many years of practicing therapy have taught me (and the research supports) that most people see positive results from therapy after only a few sessions. The key is setting clear, measurable goals at the start of therapy and maintaining an open, honest therapist/client dialogue to be sure that progress is being made along the way.
Therapy isn’t for sick people; it isn’t for crazy people. When we treat it as an opportunity to get through difficulties, expand our view of the world, resolve relationship issues, and become better versions of ourselves, it’s clear that therapy is for absolutely everyone. And real change can happen sooner than most people think!
Check out the New York Times article here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/opinion/sunday/in-therapy-forever-enough-already.html?_r=1